title: “Confirmation Bias Consumes It’s Next Willing Victim, Mike Nesbitt #nipolitics #prediction” date: 2016-05-07 categories: - “data” - “data-and-statistics”
- “northern-ireland”
 As human beings we tend to over estimate our own predictions and beliefs. When someone has a deep connection with the thing they are estimating then the bias tends to increase again.
As human beings we tend to over estimate our own predictions and beliefs. When someone has a deep connection with the thing they are estimating then the bias tends to increase again.
So spare a thought for Mike Nesbitt who put his overconfidence, admirably, on the line with the exposure to public ridicule where requested. In all honesty he wasn’t that far out, a prediction of 18⁄19 with an actual of 16. Oddly enough he’d revise his estimate down 10% then he’d be in the right area (see weather men and women of the world over estimate the chance of rain by 10% and under estimate the chance sun by 10%).
It’s also very hard to predict anything where the last event was, in reality, five years out. If anything Mr. Nesbitt only reminded us that prediction is hard when there’s a lack of data.
Revealed - how close was the UUP leader’s prediction of the number of Assembly seats his party would win:https://t.co/m6i8kuWC8e
— BBC Newsline (@bbcnewsline) May 7, 2016
//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
So Mr. Nesbitt, I know you’re not reading this and I’m neither a supporter or affiliate of the party, but at least you stuck your neck on the line and letting the BBC make a meal out of it. Next time though, revise down 10%